Sticking with the theme of biomass based geoengineering
techniques, next on the list is bio-char. Essentially, bio-char is charcoal
that is applied to land. It is made by
decomposing
biomass at high temperatures in oxygen-deprived conditions
(pyrolysis). The bio-char is then mixed with soil to act as a fertiliser and increase
the productivity of land, replicating techniques of ancient
civilisations. This removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through
photosynthesis and stores the
carbon in the soil which remains there for hundreds or
thousands of years. The video below demonstrates this process.
Woolfe et al. (2010) calculated
12% of current anthropogenic emissions could be offset using bio-char without
negatively impacting agriculture, biodiversity or food production. This is because crop
residues and invasive plants can be
used rather than converting large areas of land to purposely grow biomass. Energy production can also
be added into the pyrolysis stage. If the carbon dioxide is captured and stored,
as it is with BECCS, it provides another carbon negative energy source. The diagram
shows the positive impacts of bio-char through the production process.
Positive impacts of biomass production (Downie et al., 2012) |
Although it also uses biomass, the issues raised are
surprisingly different to those with BECCS, because it doesn’t necessarily
require purpose grown biomass. Ennis et al. (2012) investigate the specific impacts of bio-char on soil
microbiology. They identify the long lifetime of biochar in soils could have
negative side effects if it is not implemented properly because any issues
would be long-lasting. Furthermore, Williamson
(2016) highlight the issue of albedo. The darker colour of charcoal
will lower the albedo of soil, increasing the absorption of heat. If this is
applied to a significant proportion of the land’s soil this could have an
overall warming effect. However, with a proper
evaluation of the proposed sites the likelihood of these issues could
be reduced.
Personally, the idea of bio-char appeals much more to me than
BECCS. It is a low-tech process,
previously used by ancient
civilisations that is unlikely to have a large impact on global food, economy
or biodiversity if it is implemented in the right areas.
Nice piece. I hadn't actually thought about the albedo issue with bio-char, so that was an interesting one. I agree that the whole low chance of significant negative impact thing is a benefit!
ReplyDeleteThanks! I wouldn't be surprised if unforeseen negative issues cropped up if it were to be implemented. However, we can't predict everything and I feel like impacts could be more locally manageable than other geoengineering methods.
ReplyDelete